Chichester District Council Rejects HMO Plans in Selsey
A property in Selsey was set to change its use. Chichester District Council said no to converting it into a house for several tenants. The plan was to turn a building on Seal Road into a space for three people. This decision adds to the talk about how local homes are used, especially as more investors eye houses with shared spaces.
Background of the Application
Family Care Co Ltd sent in the plan. They meant to give new purpose to a house that once sheltered staff from Conifers Rest Home and care workers from the Old Malt House. During the COVID-19 crisis, the house even held residents in need. This past use shows the home has long stood for the community.
The new plan wanted to close a one-storey link to the old rest home. This move would have made the rest of the building suit a private shared home.
Council’s Rationale for Refusal
Planning officers at the council saw many issues. They noted that the building plays a key part as a local meeting place and work area. The new plan could cut back on these roles. Officers also said that the proof for the change was too weak. They did not see a clear need for the shift, especially with the continuing need for community, retail, or work space in the area.
Local council members stressed the need to keep spaces that serve the community, especially where housing is scarce. The council must guard the current places that help local life and work.
Implications for Property Investors and HMO Prospects
For those thinking of investing in shared homes, this decision sends a clear sign. The move in Selsey shows that there is a tight check on plans to change the use of houses to shared homes. Investors should do careful research and check community views. They need to back up their plans with strong facts about a property’s ability to serve shops or work areas if they want to change homes to shared use.
Local councils are also watching closely to save public spaces. This new view may bring extra hurdles for plans that shift homes into shared units.
Conclusion
The council’s rejection of the plan in Selsey marks an important moment for property investors. The search for more housing that shares spaces is real. Yet, the need for local community spots keeps a heavy weight on any change.
As local rules tighten their hold on building changes, investors must stay aware of new policies and community needs. Investors do well to meet council members early and work on plans that fit local life.
Sources
- Chichester District Council Planning Documents: publicaccess.chichester.gov.uk
- Local Democracy Reporting Service: Karen Dunn
- National World News Coverage on Property: sussexworld.co.uk
By noting what lies behind this decision, property investors can plan better for the changing UK market.