The approval of a planning application to convert a residential property on Selbourne Road into a seven-bedroom house in multiple occupation (HMO) has ignited significant backlash among local residents in Gillingham. The Medway Council’s decision, made during a committee meeting on January 15, has led to worries over privacy, security, and the impact on local infrastructure, particularly concerning parking (Medway Council, 2024). Residents have banded together to voice their concerns, describing the proposed development as tantamount to creating a ‘mini hotel’ in their neighbourhood. Despite facing strong opposition, the developer, A&E Property Ltd, remains optimistic about changing public perceptions surrounding HMOs.
Key Takeaways
- Residents of Selbourne Road are opposed to the conversion of a terraced house into a large HMO, fearing it will negatively impact their community.
- The council’s decision to approve the HMO was influenced by potential legal challenges and concerns over overcrowding.
- Opponents argue the development resembles a ‘mini hotel,’ highlighting issues of privacy and parking in the area.
Community Concerns and Opposition to HMO Development
In Gillingham, local residents on Selbourne Road are voicing strong discontent following Medway Council’s approval of plans to convert a terraced house into a seven-bedroom house in multiple occupation (HMO). The community’s concerns centre around issues of privacy, security, and the anticipated increase in parking demands, as residents argue that the conversion would effectively turn the home into a ‘mini hotel’ (Kent Online, 2024). A petition against the development was launched, highlighting the depth of local opposition. The development, proposed by A&E Property Ltd., included plans for a loft conversion and dormer windows, transforming the existing four-bedroom property. Interestingly, a six-bedroom HMO could have been developed under permitted rights had this application not been approved (Medway Messenger, 2024). During a council planning committee meeting earlier this year, a tie vote of six councillors in support and six against ensued. Cllr Chrissy Stamp, who ultimately cast the deciding vote in favor of the development, expressed regret about her choice, citing potential difficulties surrounding an appeal (Kent Live, 2024). This decision has incited ongoing debate about the increase of HMOs in residential areas and their implications for local communities.
Council Decision and Implications for Local Residents
The approval of this HMO has raised significant concerns among community members about the changing landscape of residential areas. Many locals fear that such developments may lead to a decline in the character of their neighbourhoods, prompting calls for stricter regulations regarding HMOs (Kent News, 2024). With the potential for increased noise and disruption associated with higher tenant turnover, residents are particularly worried about how this change could impact their quality of life. Furthermore, the local infrastructure may struggle to cope with the additional demands, emphasizing the need for thorough assessments by the council before approving similar applications in the future. In response to public sentiment, some council members are advocating for a review of HMO policies to ensure that community interests are prioritised in future planning decisions.
