In a call for increased protections against the proliferation of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), residents of East Durham have united, presenting a petition to the local council. With 153 signatures, this grassroots movement highlights the disparity in regulations between East Durham and more urbanised areas like the city centre, where additional safeguards are in place. Seaham councillor Kevin Shaw has voiced concerns regarding the detrimental impact of converting family homes into HMOs, particularly amid rising applications in economically vulnerable neighborhoods. Despite acknowledging the situation, the council has defended its current stance, citing the relatively low number of HMOs in the area as insufficient grounds for imposing stricter regulations or additional licensing requirements. This evolving issue reflects broader tensions around housing policy and community well-being, with calls for a more robust response echoing throughout the region.
Key Takeaways
- Residents in East Durham are pushing for stricter regulations on houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) due to concerns over housing quality and community safety.
- The petition, which has gathered 153 signatures, highlights the inconsistent protections between East Durham and more urban areas.
- Council officials indicate that the low concentration of HMOs in East Durham currently prevents the implementation of stricter licensing requirements.
Concerns Over Increasing HMO Conversions
Residents in East Durham have raised significant concerns regarding the increasing number of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) through a petition submitted to the Durham County Council. The petition, which has garnered 153 signatures, calls for enhanced regulations that would mirror the protections seen in urban centres, such as Durham City. Seaham councillor Kevin Shaw has been vocal about the community’s apprehensions, particularly the worrying trend of converting essential family homes into HMOs in economically disadvantaged areas. This increase in applications for HMO conversions has sparked fears about rising anti-social behaviour and crime in East Durham, with Shaw suggesting that the existing selective licensing is inadequate to address these issues. Although the council acknowledged that landlords need planning permission for HMOs accommodating more than six residents, they noted that the current low percentage of HMOs in the East Durham region does not justify advancing towards stricter regulations or invoking an Article 4 direction that could impose additional licensing requirements. Planning head Michael Kelleher stated that while HMOs are a more pressing concern within Durham City due to their higher concentration, East Durham’s relatively lower prevalence does not necessitate similar action at this time. This situation exemplifies the ongoing debate over balancing housing needs and community integrity in the face of changing demographics and economic pressures.
Community Response and Council Stance
In response to the petition submitted by East Durham residents, the local council is faced with the challenge of balancing community concerns against regulatory measures. The petitioners highlight a perceived disparity in housing protections across different areas, particularly voicing fears that the current initiatives are insufficient to mitigate issues that arise from an increased number of HMOs. Councillor Shaw’s advocacy for stricter regulations resonates with many locals who believe that unchecked conversions could lead to further deterioration in living conditions, particularly in vulnerable communities. This situation raises important questions about how local authorities prioritize housing policies and the effectiveness of existing licensing measures in areas with relatively low HMO density. As the council deliberates its next steps, the outcome could significantly influence the future of rental housing in East Durham and set a precedent for how similar cases are managed across the UK (Durham County Council, 2024).
Please ask us questions via WhatsApp, email, or direct messaging.
