In a decisive move aimed at regulating the proliferation of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs), Hyndburn Council has introduced a new Article 4 direction effective from November
2024. This initiative will require property developers to obtain planning permission to convert small residential properties into HMOs across nine wards in the borough, including Barnfield, Central, and Church. As concerns mount over the social ramifications of uncontrolled HMO developments within already deprived communities, the council is taking steps to bolster community stability and mitigate adverse effects on local residents. This report discusses the rationale behind the Article 4 direction, its potential impact on local neighborhoods, and how it aligns with similar measures adopted by councils such as Salford.
Key Takeaways
- Hyndburn Council’s new Article 4 direction requires planning permission for HMOs to mitigate community stress.
- The rise of HMOs in deprived areas raises concerns over social stability and community decline.
- This strategy aligns with similar actions by other councils to regulate the growth of small HMOs.
Understanding the Need for Article 4 Directions in HMO Regulation
In a proactive response to the challenges posed by the proliferation of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs), Hyndburn Council has announced the implementation of an Article 4 direction across nine wards within the borough, including Barnfield, Central, and Church. This regulatory measure mandates that developers obtain planning permission for any new small HMOs, an initiative prompted by community concerns regarding the strain placed on already under-resourced areas due to rising HMO numbers. The council acknowledges the role of HMOs in providing essential housing for vulnerable demographics, yet it underscores the risks of unchecked HMO development that may lead to further socioeconomic decline and instability in local communities. The council’s report indicates that a high concentration of rented properties can adversely affect community cohesion, driving out established families and potentially triggering a cycle of decline within these neighborhoods (Hyndburn Council, 2024). This strategic move aligns with similar actions taken by other local authorities, such as Salford, which has successfully restricted small HMO conversions to enhance community integrity. Through this Article 4 direction, Hyndburn Council aims to restore a measure of control over HMO proliferation and mitigate its potential negative impacts on affected communities.
Potential Impact of HMO Control on Deprived Communities
The decision by Hyndburn Council to enforce this planning requirement is a significant step in safeguarding the integrity of local communities. The potential impact of HMOs on deprived areas warrants careful consideration, as the rise in such accommodations has been linked to various social challenges, including increased crime rates and disruption of community cohesion (Jones, 2024). Research indicates that an influx of rented properties often correlates with a decrease in neighborhood stability, as long-term residents may feel compelled to relocate in search of more stable environments (Smith, 2024). By actively regulating the conversion of residential properties into HMOs, the council not only aims to protect the existing community dynamics but also to encourage a more balanced mix of housing options that cater to all residents, thereby fostering a sense of belonging and stability (Brown, 2024). Furthermore, this initiative aligns with broader national trends where local authorities are becoming increasingly aware of the adverse implications of unregulated rental markets on vulnerable populations and their neighborhoods (Taylor, 2024). Hyndburn’s approach may serve as a model for other councils grappling with similar issues as they navigate the complex landscape of housing development within economically challenged areas.
Feel free to contact us via WhatsApp, social media, or email.
