In a contentious decision, the Somerset Council’s planning committee recently greenlit plans for a 30-bed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) on Friarn Street in Bridgwater. This approval has sparked a backlash from local councillors and residents concerned about potential flood risks posed by the nearby Durleigh Brook, as well as mounting parking problems in the area. Bridgwater Town Council leader Brian Smedley was particularly vocal in his opposition, referencing the detrimental consequences of development decisions made by out-of-county planners without adequate consideration for local interests. Despite these concerns, some committee members defended the project, asserting that the need for more affordable housing outweighs the risks. The decision highlights the ongoing tensions between development needs and community safety in Bridgwater.
Key Takeaways
- The Somerset Council’s approval of a 30-bed HMO in Bridgwater has sparked significant local controversy.
- Concerns regarding flooding risks and inadequate parking were raised by local councillors but ultimately overlooked in the decision.
- Local leaders argue that this development may threaten community safety and alter the historic ambiance of the area.
Local Concerns Over Flood Risks and Community Safety
In recent discussions surrounding community safety and flood risks, the Somerset Council’s approval of a new 30-bed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) on Friarn Street in Bridgwater has sparked significant local concern. The planning committee for the former Sedgemoor area sanctioned the development despite worries regarding potential flooding from the adjacent Durleigh Brook and a shortage of parking spaces. Local councillor Brian Smedley, also the leader of the Bridgwater Town Council, articulated strong objections, emphasizing that such developments, previously decided by representatives far removed from the community, have historically endangered local safety (Somerset Live, 2024). Additionally, councillor Kathy Pearce highlighted worries about the potential erosion of the area’s historical character and existing parking deficiencies. In contrast, Councillor Alastair Hendry defended the initiative, noting that many future HMO residents may not own vehicles, thereby countering claims of adequate parking availability in the town center. Despite the divided opinions, the committee ultimately favored the proposal, deciding by a vote of seven to three to move forward with the development. This decision raises important questions about balancing growth with community well-being, particularly in flood-prone areas.
Debate on Parking Issues and Development Impact
Critics of the decision have underscored the implications for infrastructure, stressing that the increased density from the new HMO could exacerbate existing issues in nearby residential areas. Councillor Smedley suggested that this could lead to congestion and further obstruct access for emergency vehicles, which is particularly concerning in regions still recovering from flood-related incidents. Moreover, he raised the issue of safety for pedestrians, particularly children and the elderly, who may face increased traffic as a result of the new residents. Additionally, concerns regarding the adequacy of public transport options were raised, questioning the sustainability of encouraging higher density living without corresponding improvements in accessible transport (Western Daily Press, 2024). Call for a more comprehensive planning approach to accommodate community needs alongside development opportunities highlights the ongoing tension between urban expansion and preserving local character and safety.
Please ask us questions via WhatsApp, email, or direct messaging.
